Rating: - The definitive bland sequel
I'd be willing to bet that Wes would rather not have this one included in his filmography, but after sitting through this I'm in no mood to let him forget it. The Hills Have Eyes part 2 may very well be the text-book definition of "ineffective sequel". This rather belated follow up to The Hills Have Eyes surfaced around 1985, and it doesn't make much of an effort to hide its many attempts to blend in with the horror trends of the time. With an all teen cast, score by Harry Manfredini, and female ... Read More
Rating: - Story better then the first!
OK, First of all i was extremely dissappointed with the first one. I think the story line and lack of ideal direction in the movie made me question wes craven. This one on the other hand was much better storied and acted. Though i caution to viewers this is a really cheesy (B) movie and if you ,like me find these movies entertaining then you might like it otherwise your better off renting it for a buck at blockbuster first!
Rating: - good sequel
i liked this one allmost az much az pt.1 (original film not tha remake). im not really feelin these new remakes tho. if u liked tha original hills have eyes then this iz great 4 tha collection
Rating: - Awsome sequel to Hills
They have a remake out now but this origional sequal to hills is great. Good gore and blood too.
Rating: - Weakquel to a B-Movie Drive-In Classic
Hills II, as has been said before, was an attempt to repeat the success not only of the first flick, but also of the up-and-coming Jason and Halloween franchises -- released just as the Freddie franchise was starting. Actually, the film plays well if watched right after the first, but it cannot stand on its own.
It contains some of the now standard cliches of the 80s slasher flicks: the guys are immature, the women are intuitive, but discounted, and the post-adolescent sex/skinny ... Read More